42 Years - A Professional Law Corporation - Helping Asbestos Victims Since 1974

Posts by: Steven Kazan

Communities Dealing with High Asbestos Exposure Risks

asbestos exposureUsually, when we hear about cases of asbestos exposure, we hear about individuals who weren’t adequately protected from this material. They may have encountered asbestos because of their jobs, or because someone they lived with handled asbestos on a regular basis. There are also aging buildings that can put people at risk because they’re both old and in poor condition, causing mineral fibers to break off of asbestos-containing products.

What’s beyond appalling is when we hear of entire communities dealing with asbestos exposure. These types of situations raise many questions: Who’s responsible for placing these people at risk? What can be done to protect future generations? What do the locals know about the hazards surrounding asbestos exposure?

Recently, I read about a student at the University of Pennsylvania who’s currently studying one former factory town in order to answer some of these questions.

People don’t realize that ‘risk is real’
Shabnam Elahi, a senior at Penn, is a biology major who decided to focus her research on a town named Ambler, which is 40 minutes northeast of Philadelphia. In 1881, Ambler became home to an asbestos factory. By mid-20th century, the science connecting asbestos to potentially fatal diseases such as malignant mesothelioma became too difficult to deny, and factories such as the one in Ambler began to shut down.

Unfortunately, a lot of the waste product was left behind.

Eventually, the federal Environmental Protection Agency designated Ambler as a Superfund site, which gives the government the power to oversee the rehabilitation of the area’s cleanup.

Meanwhile, Elahi, along with her colleagues and mentors, is speaking to the people of the town in order to learn who’s developing mesothelioma, who’s most at risk and what people know about the risks surrounding asbestos exposure.

Frances Barg, associate professor of family medicine and community health in Penn’s Perelman School of Medicine and associate professor in the anthropology department (and also a mentor of Elahi), also told Penn News that the long period of time it takes for this disease to develop led people to have a misconception that asbestos-related risks aren’t deserving of so much worry.

Ultimately, Elahi can use this information to predict who’s at risk and figure out how to help them.

There are asbestos Superfund sites everywhere
Ambler isn’t the only place in the U.S. that the federal government thinks is deserving of help for an asbestos problem. Across the country, there are other communities dealing with these issues.

Among the most well-known of these towns is Libby, Mont. This community was once a world leader in the mining and processing of vermiculite, a significant proportion of which was tainted with asbestos.

In California, there are two areas being considered for Superfund designation sites: El Dorado Hills, where the soil around a high school was found to contain asbestos, and Clear Creek Management Area, where recreational vehicles are liable to disturb asbestos fibers in the soil.

There are several things you can do to keep dust out of your house. When it comes to driving vehicles, walking, running or playing, make sure that you and your children stick only with paved surfaces or ground that has some sort of covering, like shredded rubber, grass, sand or asphalt. Before entering the house, remove your shoes and ensure that your pets have clean feet and fur.

Hurricane Sandy Aftermath Leaves Residents at Risk for Asbestos Exposure

Hurricane_SandyDuring the fall of 2012, the northeastern U.S. endured what’s considered the most expensive natural disaster in the history of the country. Hurricane Sandy struck New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and other states. Government experts estimated that up to 12 inches of precipitation fell between Oct. 29 and Oct. 31. By Nov. 30, more than 100 people died.

In the aftermath, citizens had to deal with extensive flood cleanup. However, there’s more to worry about than water damage in the buildings. The actual flood waters themselves may have carried toxic waste away from isolated sites and into residential areas, increasing the risks for asbestos exposure and other hazards. News12 New Jersey recently caught up with the city of Little Ferry, where health experts warned residents about the new dangers that may be lurking in their soil.

Contaminants may be ‘entering the food chain’
The residents of Little Ferry are worried because during Hurricane Sandy, flood waters coursed through the neighborhood from areas that are deemed Superfund sites. Superfund sites are places that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has dubbed worthy of attention as a cleanup site due to the presence of toxic materials, including asbestos. These are often the locations of former industrial complexes.

Even after the water receded, residents are still concerned about what may have been left behind in their soil.

Here’s what homeowner Regina Coyle told News12 New Jersey about her vegetable garden:

“I’m afraid of the lead, I’m afraid of the possible arsenic, those kinds of things entering the food chain.”

Furthermore, the environmental group Climate Central estimated that Hurricane Sandy spread 5 billion gallons of raw sewage throughout New Jersey alone.

Government and environmental groups offered conflicting accounts of how genuine the health threats from the soil are. The EPA said that toxin-tainted soil at the Superfund sites was confined to areas that were off-limits to the public, but conceded that this was only based on visual inspections rather than lab tests. Meanwhile, the company RTK Environmental Group warned the news source that soil samples at different sites found contamination levels that are triple what’s acceptable.

There’s disagreement over the value of soil testing in this case because the flood waters covered a wide area, and academic experts warn that normal test results may not cover all the grounds. In the meantime, Bergen County Health officials advise gardeners to grow their vegetables using potted soil in containers raised off of the ground.

Remember these other cleanup tips
During any disaster that involves property damage – flooding, storms, earthquakes, fires and so on – it’s important to remember that debris of any sort may be tainted with asbestos. Handling this waste can increase the risk for fatal illnesses, including malignant mesothelioma.

If you suspect a building or house damaged in a disaster contains products tainted with asbestos, contact your local public health authorities to let them know. If the asbestos is still in your house, they can advise you on the best way to take care of it, which may involve either repairing it or removing it – two processes that you shouldn’t attempt to do on your own. Containing the asbestos usually involves sealing or covering the products within a leak-free material.

Latest Trends in Asbestos-Related Disease

asbestos diseaseIt’s common knowledge in the scientific community that exposure to asbestos drives the development of several diseases. However, it’s important to remember that scientific knowledge doesn’t stand still. Researchers are always trying to learn something new when it comes to asbestos-related diseases, whether it has to do with diagnosis, treatment or prevention.

During the course of a few years, it’s easy for the research community to acquire so much knowledge that it’s hard to keep track of everything. Recently, I came across an article in The Clinical Respiratory Journal, in which scientists from Australia took a step back and reviewed what is known about illnesses caused by asbestos exposure.

What is the U.S.’s policy on asbestos?
Before we get into what the scientists wrote in their article, let’s take a moment to remember that asbestos is still a health threat in the U.S. The fact that it’s often a topic of discussion as a health threat may mislead people into thinking that it’s no longer allowed in this country. Unfortunately, they’d be wrong, but it’s not for lack of trying.

Asbestos was a common component of many construction materials up until the 1970s. Due to the growing scientific consensus connecting the mineral to diseases such as malignant pleural mesothelioma, responsible companies started eliminating asbestos from their manufacturing processes. Elsewhere, the federal government started banning the use of certain asbestos products. These efforts came to a head in 1989, when the Environmental Protection Agency prohibited most uses of asbestos. However, the powerful asbestos lobby successfully reversed most of this policy.

As it stands now in the U.S., new uses of asbestos are banned, along with inclusion in the manufacturing of rollboard, flooring felt, corrugated paper, construction paper and specialty paper. It is still allowed in products that have always used it, such as cement sheets.

What does the latest review tell us?
The continued use of asbestos is significant because of its ties to illness. While malignant mesothelioma is arguably the most feared of these diseases, it’s important to remember that the breadth of asbestos-related diseases is wider than that. Other complications include asbestosis, pleural plaques, diffuse pleural thickening, benign pleural effusions, rounded atelectasis and lung cancer.

Here’s what the researchers had to write about the progress in addressing these health issues:

“No new treatments have been developed for the benign [asbestos-related diseases]. Significant advances have been made in chest imaging and nuclear medicine techniques, which have greatly assisted in diagnosis and treatment planning, and in thoracoscopic surgical techniques for diagnosing [malignant mesothelioma]. Sadly, [malignant mesothelioma] remains a deadly disease despite much research endeavor.”

They suggested that further research on the mechanisms of mesothelioma can help the medical community provide more effective treatment.

What can consumers do now?
The review authors suggested that, in the meantime, the best way to tackle asbestos-related diseases is to prevent them in the first place. That means banning the use and production of asbestos around the globe.

The World Health Organization is working with several intergovernment groups and the International Labour Organization to support education on the dangers of asbestos and the use of safe alternative materials. Meanwhile, you as the consumer need to continue to pressure your legislators so that they know that you don’t want your life to be in danger.

Robot May Protect Workers from Asbestos Exposure

asbestos exposureIn an effort to control the pollution problem, entire cities and neighborhoods have adopted recycling programs. And it’s not just the number of programs that’s expanding – it’s also the number of materials. In addition to plastic, glass and paper, more programs are accommodating the collection of compost and electronics.

However, the construction and demolition industries leave much to be desired by way of waste recycling. This is due to several reasons, including the fact that this waste is still manually sorted, and the risk of asbestos exposure and other hazardous materials is still an issue.

Fortunately, scientists aren’t content to let waste reduction efforts lag. Recently, I read an article from CNN that talked about a tech company based in Finland. The innovators at ZenRobotics created a robot with artificial intelligence that enables it to learn how to sort through the recyclable rubble of construction and demolition waste.

Once this technology is perfected, it can mean a real boon to workers who wouldn’t have to worry as much about asbestos exposure when cleaning up waste from buildings.

Robotic ‘brain’ can apply knowledge at conveyor belt
Experts estimate that construction and demolition are responsible for more than one-third of all solid waste. In the U.S., this amounts to 325 million tons every year. This trend coincides with the deplorable fact that 80 percent of potentially recyclable waste eventually ends up in landfills.

When it comes to waste from buildings, the organization of these materials has a lot of room for improvement.

Jufo Peltomaa, founder of ZenRobotics, was reportedly struck by inspiration when he watched a documentary that featured the disposal and recycling of a B52 bomber. The employees picking through the waste looked bored, and Peltomaa thought it would be helpful to have a robotic sorter.

The ZenRobotics Recycler, or ZRR, is equipped with technology that allows for weight measurement, tactile assessment, three-dimensional scanning and more – all of which allows the machine to sort through different types of material on a conveyor belt.

Where is the asbestos in all the rubble?
Although asbestos exposure is the only proven cause of fatal diseases such as malignant mesothelioma, there are still many products that include this material in their manufacturing processes. These include vermiculite insulation, certain cement products, vinyl flooring and adhesives, roofing and siding shingles, textured paint and patching compounds, piping insulation and furnace gaskets. Asbestos-containing products are particularly plentiful in buildings that were constructed before the 1980s.

Typically, asbestos products pose no health problems to people as long as they are kept intact. However, this is not the case during demolition, and the physical disturbances can send mineral fibers airborne.

However, a machine like the ZRR can make asbestos exposure unnecessary for demolition and construction crews.

Other inventions are on the horizon
What’s exciting to us at Kazan Law is the fact that the ZRR isn’t the only gadget in development that can help protect people from asbestos fibers. Scientists from the University of Hertfordshire in the U.K. have invented a device that can analyze air samples for the presence of asbestos fibers in real time. This is a vast improvement over current techniques of asbestos detection, which can take hours. The first commercially available devices should be ready within the next two years.

High School Students Fight Asbestos Exposure in Court

high school studentsHigh school is a time for adolescents to learn more about the responsibilities that adults face. One of the most important things that high school students learn about is using their voice, which is particularly important if they need to seek justice against someone who’s wronged them. Recently, I came across a story in the Merced Sun-Star, which talked about former high school students who were preparing to make statements in federal court against a non-profit organization that illegally used them to perform abatement work. This ultimately put them at risk for asbestos exposure in the process.

Vocational students lacked proper training
In 1998, the Merced County Housing Authority launched a non-profit agency known as Firm Build, which had a goal of modernizing public housing while teaching residents marketable skills. In 2005, the Merced County Office of Education negotiated a lease with Firm Build to renovate a Castle Commerce Center building as an automotive teaching center.

During the project, Firm Build made an appalling attempt at taking short cuts by selecting nine vocational high school students and having them remove asbestos. These youngsters were not properly trained on how to handle asbestos, and didn’t receive any protective material to prevent asbestos exposure.

In March 2013, three project managers pleaded no contest to violating federal asbestos exposure regulations. They were convicted in May.

Final sentencing of these perpetrators is scheduled for August. At this time, the former students, who are now all in their 20s, will make statements before the court about how the project managers endangered their lives. Meanwhile, the federal prosecutor still has time to reach out to more former students who may want to make statements also.

Stories need to be shared
The point of making an impact statement during the sentencing phase of a criminal case is for victims to have their say about how the convicted criminals hurt them, which can influence the sentence that’s ultimately handed down.

If you’ve been hurt by asbestos, you don’t have to wait until the responsible parties have been brought to court. You should tell everyone your story, including news media and your lawmakers, who have to power to control how asbestos is regulated. If you consult a law firm that specializes in asbestos cases, you can also learn about your legal recourse in launching a lawsuit in civil court.

In the meantime, schools have a responsibility to protect students from asbestos exposure. Parents who are worried about whether the schools are doing this job the way they should can contact their local education agencies, which are responsible for inspecting school buildings for potential asbestos exposure dangers.

Every year, asbestos-related diseases such as malignant pleural mesothelioma claim more than 9,900 lives. That figure may not reach its peak for another 10 years or so, partly because these illnesses can take 20 to 50 years to fully manifest themselves. Today’s high school students shouldn’t have to worry about being among those who get sick.

Asbestos Lawsuit Evidence that Won a $27.3 Million Verdict

Last month I announced the $27.3 million asbestos lawsuit verdict Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood obtained against Owens-Illinois, a former manufacturer of KAYLO asbestos containing thermal pipe insulation. Our client, Rose-Marie Grigg was diagnosed with mesothelioma in the fall of 2011. Her disease was caused from exposure to deadly asbestos fibers she inhaled while handling and washing the clothes of her husband, an insulator for a company that used KAYLO products.

In this video, Joe Satterley, Kazan Law partner and lead attorney in the asbestos lawsuit trial, discusses some of the evidence that was presented to the jury. Animations illustrate how Mrs. Grigg’s husband’s clothes were contaminated and how Mrs. Grigg came to develop her fatal disease. Evidence also proves that Owens-Illinois knew that their KAYLO product was dangerous, yet continued mass volume production with packaging and marketing that claimed it was non-toxic.

All of us at Kazan Law were very excited that the jury’s decision in this asbestos lawsuit gave the Griggs justice at last, and in the process also did justice to Owens-Illinois by imposing an $11 million penalty to punish Owens-Illinois and make an example of them to help educate all of Corporate America about the need to protect consumers. While money cannot replace the wonderful married life that has been permanently injured, the asbestos lawsuit verdict is an important win towards holding corporations accountable for their past horrible decisions.

Kazan Law Attorneys Selected as Northern California Super Lawyers for 10th Consecutive Year

Kazan Law 2013 Super Lawyers

From top left, Northern California Super Lawyers Steven Kazan, David McClain, Joseph Satterley, James Oberman, Justin Bosl, William Ruiz, Michael Stewart

The objective of Super Lawyers is to create a credible listing of outstanding attorneys that can be used as a resource for attorneys and consumers searching for legal counsel. We are very proud to announce that Kazan Law attorneys have been named to the prestigious Northern California Super Lawyers list for the tenth consecutive year.

Attorneys are selected by Super Lawyers using a multiphase selection process which received a patent from The United States Patent and Trademark Office in April 2013. The patent is a distinction which demonstrates credibility as an impartial third-party rating system.

Attorneys are nominated by peers and evaluations are combined with third party research. Each candidate is evaluated on 12 indicators of peer recognition and professional achievement. Selections are made on an annual, state-by-state basis.

Attorneys named to Northern California Super Lawyers represent no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. We are honored to have these five Kazan Law attorneys included in this list:

Steven Kazan: Super Lawyer 2004-2013
David McClain: Super Lawyer 2004-2013
Joseph Satterley: Super Lawyer 2013 (selected in Kentucky)
Gordon Greenwood: Super Lawyer 2004, 2006-2013
James Oberman: Super Lawyer 2010-2011, 2013

Rising Stars

Super Lawyers Rising Stars recognize the top up-and-coming attorneys in the state. The selection process for the Rising Stars list is the same as the Super Lawyers selection process, except to be eligible for inclusion in Rising Stars, a candidate must be either 40 years old or younger or in practice for 10 years or less. No more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state are named to this list. We are very proud of the four Kazan Law asbestos attorneys named Rising Stars this year:

Justin Bosl: Rising Star 2011-2013
Gloria Amell*: Rising Star 2011-2013
William Ruiz: Rising Star 2012-2013
Michael Stewart: Rising Star 2013

*Ms. Amell left the firm in June 2013.

California University Deals with Asbestos Exposure in Food Court

Sacramento State UniversityIf you were to ask college students what they thought was the most dangerous location on their campus, they would probably think of the science facilities. The chemistry building houses volatile chemicals. The physics building can have radioactive materials. The biology building is home to bacterial cell cultures. Odds are no one would say that his or her student union building, the hub of social activity, poses an asbestos exposure threat. However, more of these stories are popping up around the U.S.

Recently, I read a story in The State Hornet, which is the school paper for Sacramento State University. As part of the effort to renovate the Union building, administrators and construction workers announced that they were also implementing an asbestos abatement project.

Facilities remove ‘suspicious’ material
Ordinarily, asbestos doesn’t pose a health threat to anyone as long as it remains intact. However, construction and renovation projects can easily disturb the asbestos and release airborne mineral fibers. If inhaled, these fibers can lead to the development of potentially fatal diseases, such as malignant pleural mesothelioma and lung cancer.

At Sacramento State, the school renovated the food court of the Union building. As part of the process, workers removed floor tiles that were bonded with asbestos-laden adhesive. Technically, the asbestos didn’t have to be removed, but for the sake of safety, workers carried out this abatement project.

Here’s what Stephen Leland, the occupational safety specialist at the school, told the paper:

“Our policy is not to bury asbestos…everything that’s not metal, brick or wood is a suspect material.”

To keep the air clean, fumes were filtered and vented through the building’s east entrance. Completion of the project was projected for early June.

Presence of asbestos isn’t unique
Sacramento State isn’t the only college campus that’s had to deal with asbestos. After all, this mineral was a common component in construction materials before the 1980s.  Back in March 2013, the school paper at Kansas State University in Manhattan, Kan., reported that several buildings on campus had asbestos-containing materials. At least one classroom was closed because asbestos fibers were detected, and a renovation project at the student union building raised concerns. In the latter case, asbestos was likely to be present in the ceiling tiles and roofing materials.

Schools have a responsibility to minimize risk
The fact that the occupational safety specialists at Sacramento State University fully disclosed the risks surrounding their renovation project is admirable. After all, we at Kazan Law have had to deal with many unscrupulous companies that would rather keep their consumers in the dark about asbestos.

Still, that doesn’t mean that students don’t have to be vigilant about asbestos exposure on their campus. The Environmental Resource Center for Higher Education discusses the safety standards surrounding renovation, construction and demolition projects on school grounds. These include written notification of major projects to the federal Environmental Protection Agency at least 10 days before the start, regulations regarding ventilation and the handling of materials in which asbestos fibers are likely to break apart.

Occupational Asbestos Exposure Rampant in Developing Countries

occupational asbestos exposure The world grows smaller as more countries begin to interact with one another. One troublesome trend has emerged, though – wealthier nations continue to take advantage of developing nations by using cheap overseas labor to manufacture their goods. Such an imbalance of power often comes at the cost of the safety of the international workers. When employed by irresponsible companies, these individuals can face several hazards, including occupational asbestos exposure.

Recent stories from Asia remind us of the plight of these workers, as well as a consumer’s capacity to bring about positive change.

Bangladesh garment industry serves as poignant example

The most recent incident of injustice against laborers occurred in Bangladesh this past April. During the last week of the month, a multistory building in the suburb of Savar that housed garment industry workers collapsed, killing 1,127 individuals. Government investigations revealed several factors leading to the collapse. The foundation was unfit for construction because it was swampy, building materials were shoddy and operating machinery vibrated at a high rate, as reported by the Associated Press.

Adding insult to injury was the fact that the average factory worker was paid $38 a month by a $20 billion per year industry.

It’s incidents like these that remind us of why workers need someone to speak up for them. Kazan Law helps people who are dealing with mesothelioma and other diseases caused by occupational asbestos exposure. We take unscrupulous parties to court, and we advocate for better workplace safety

Unfortunately, the economic and government systems of certain countries still don’t allow that opportunity.

Occupational Asbestos Exposure: Indian Workers Deal with Sickness

One recent study, published in the Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, discussed the interviews that researchers conducted among the former workers of a factory that manufactured asbestos sheets and cement before closing in 1983. Several of these workers had asbestosis or other respiratory problems.

Based on the interviews, the researchers learned that the company didn’t provide adequate protection. To make matters worse, workers weren’t well aware of the risks. This was partly due to the long latency periods of asbestos-induced diseases, coupled with the economic factors that pressured workers to take these jobs in the first place.

The researchers concluded that more programs regulated by independent government bodies are needed to educate workers about their rights and the health hazards of asbestos. Rehabilitation programs that emphasize palliative care are also needed in India.

However, the best solution is an outright ban on the asbestos trade, the researchers said. Such a policy may be a long time coming because of the power of the asbestos lobby. One of the proponents’ arguments to continue the use of the mineral is the idea that if science makes the health risks of occupational asbestos exposure clear, governments should be knowledgeable about how to adequately protect workers. Unfortunately, as has become apparent, the governments of developing nations rarely enforce such policies.

Overall, about 125 million people all over the planet are exposed to asbestos in the workplace. So what can concerned consumers do? After the Bangladesh building collapse, several clothing companies made it a point to stop doing business with irresponsible companies.

Perhaps we can take a lesson from this and apply it to trading partners who don’t protect their workers from occupational asbestos exposure. As a consumer, you have a voice. If any of the companies that you patronize have overseas factories, let them know that you’re concerned about the health and safety of their workers, and that you’ll stop giving them your business if they don’t protect their employees from hazards which include occupational asbestos exposure.

Prospective Home Buyers Should Ask Questions about Asbestos Exposure

asbestos exposureWhenever people look at a home they’re considering for purchase, they ask the real estate agents many important questions: Do the nearby schools provide quality education? How closely do we live to shopping centers? Are the neighbors nice?

Of course, all of these issues concern matters outside the home. When thinking about the inside, there’s one question that must not be overlooked: Will asbestos exposure be a problem?

If you’re a young adult, you may not be familiar with asbestos. The gravity of the risk might also seem surprising, particularly because asbestos-related diseases, such as malignant mesothelioma, are usually only seen in older adults. What you may not know is that these diseases can develop between 20 and 50 years after the initial exposure to asbestos. For these reasons, you need to be mindful of asbestos now, before even buying a house.

Risk is bigger within older homes
Asbestos is the only proven risk factor for mesothelioma. The mineral has also been tied to asbestosis, another respiratory disease, and cancers of the lungs and gastrointestinal system. One of the reasons why asbestos is so dangerous is because it’s virtually undetectable to the five senses, so it’s not always obvious whether a product contains the mineral.

It wasn’t until the mid-1970s that responsible companies and government officials began to recognize the health risks associated with asbestos exposure. Before then, though, asbestos was highly regarded for its strength and fireproofing capabilities. This is why it was such a popular component of construction materials in houses, particularly those that were built before 1960. However, there are certain products that are used in construction today that are still allowed to use asbestos in their manufacturing processes.

Where around the house is asbestos found?
In older houses, asbestos is likely to be present in:

  • Cloth wire insulation
  • Electrical panels
  • Floor tile mastic
  • Linoleum flooring
  • Spray-on insulation
  • Insulation for heating and cooling system products
  • Textured paint
  • Ceiling tiles
  • Ceiling tile mastic
  • Popcorn ceilings
  • Siding
  • Wall panels
  • Plaster
  • Vermiculite
  • Caulking
  • Spackling compounds
  • Adhesives
  • Window glazing

Additionally, asbestos is still allowed in the manufacturing of:

  • Cement sheets
  • Cement pipes
  • Cement shingles
  • Gaskets
  • Vinyl floor tiles
  • Roofing felt
  • Roof coatings
  • Non-roofing coatings

Asbestos doesn’t have to be a deal breaker
As frightening as asbestos exposure sounds, you don’t necessarily have to turn down a house because the material is present. Generally, there’s no health risk to you as long as the asbestos-containing materials are in good condition and remain intact. It’s only when the products are damaged that mineral fibers can become airborne.

So, when you’re considering a home, ask the real estate agent about the presence of asbestos and whether the products are in good shape. One hypothetical situation you must consider is the need to have licensed professionals come in, inspect the asbestos and take appropriate measures, which may include repair or removal. When discussing this scenario with the agent, ask questions about who would be responsible for what costs. From there, you can make an informed decision about whether the house is still a worthwhile investment for you and your family.

You should be able to picture the future that you want in your house. The last thing you need is for asbestos to mar that picture.

Get a Free Case Evaluation
The owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.