42 Years - A Professional Law Corporation - Helping Asbestos Victims Since 1974

Posts by: Steven Kazan

Breakthrough Gadget Helps Workers to Detect Asbestos

airborne asbestosOne of the most alarming dangers of asbestos is that the mineral fibers aren’t immediately noticeable. They’re odorless, and they’re usually too small to see once they’re airborne. This is incredibly terrifying because there’s no known safe level of asbestos exposure, and it only takes a small amount of the material to lead to potentially deadly disease.

This is exactly why a team of scientists from the University of Hertfordshire in the U.K. decided to invent a new tool that, one day, may help workers all over the world, including carpenters, ship breakers, electricians and automotive brake specialists, easily detect asbestos.

How do you know something has asbestos right now?
For thousands of years, people used asbestos because its physical properties make it strong, fireproof and resistant to heat. It wasn’t until the late 20th century that responsible companies and governments started paying attention to scientific studies linking asbestos use to diseases such as malignant mesothelioma and lung cancer.

The use of asbestos has been somewhat reduced in the U.S. Though new manufacturing uses are forbidden, it’s still allowed in several items, including cement products. Additionally, asbestos is still present in many older buildings that were constructed using such materials.

Today, if it’s unclear whether the air at a work site contains asbestos fibers, trained professionals filter air samples, count any fibers and use X-rays to identify them. An alternative method is to use fiber detecting tools that work in real-time. However, these approaches are often time-consuming or nonspecific.

A new tool may come in less than two years
The idea that there may be a more convenient tool to detect asbestos is really exciting to us at Kazan Law, which is why we were so thrilled to read the story from the University of Hertfordshire. A team of scientists from the School of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics was motivated to get on the case after looking at the numbers.

Here’s what researcher Paul Kaye had to say:

“Many thousands of people around the world have died from asbestos fiber inhalation. Even today, long after asbestos use was banned in most Western countries, there are many people who become exposed to asbestos that was used in buildings decades earlier, and these people too are dying from that exposure.”

More specifically, the World Health Organization estimates that every year, more than 107,000 lives are lost because of asbestos exposure in the workplace.

Together, Kaye and his team turned to an old concept developed by an American scientist who pointed out that asbestos fibers have unique magnetic properties. The researchers then created a gadget that uses a combination of lasers and magnetic fields to detect asbestos. The advantage to this tool is that it can be used in real-time.

The target price for the first available products in the U.K. and Spain is between $700 and $800, projected to be released 12 to 18 months from now. But if production is successful, that price will go down.

In the meantime, vulnerable workers need to remember that the permissible exposure limit for asbestos is 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter averaged over an eight-hour shift, or 1 fiber per cubic centimeter averaged over 30 minutes. If your job exceeds these limits, your employer is required to provide you with adequate protection, such as respirators, full-body clothing, face shields and vented goggles.

Reducing Dangers of Asbestos Exposures in Natural Disasters

asbestos_exposureThe recent tornado that tore through Moore, Oklahoma is a national tragedy. Houses, schools and other structures were devastated, and at least 24 people, including nine children, died.

At a time when survivors are overwhelmed by several pressing needs – relocating loved ones and pets, finding adequate shelter, tending to injuries – it’s easy to forget that going through the wreckage can be a very dangerous venture. Among the debris are several hazards, including asbestos exposure. It’s important for all of us in the nation to come together and extend whatever help we can, and at Kazan Law, we’re going to take this as an opportunity to go over some of the safety concerns that surround tornado wreckage.

Where is asbestos found in such a disaster?
Prior to the 1980s, asbestos was quite prevalent in building and construction materials because of physical properties that made it resistant to heat and friction. Once the scientific link between asbestos and deadly diseases such as malignant mesothelioma was established, a growing number of government officials and responsible companies began to reduce their use of this mineral. Still, the asbestos industry successfully lobbied to allow the material to remain a part of the manufacturing process of several products.

When it comes to buildings devastated by tornadoes, asbestos exposure is a risk if the structures had millboard, vermiculite, roofing felt, vinyl flooring, pipeline wrap and asbestos cement products, including corrugated sheets, flat sheets, pipes and shingles.

The Environmental Protection Agency and other government groups have learned a lot from past disasters, such as the tornado that struck parts of Missouri in 2011. Namely, there’s no easy way of telling whether parts of the wreckage contain asbestos unless homeowners remember if the products were clearly labeled. Otherwise, specially trained experts need to conduct scientific analyses. Whenever homeowners are in doubt, they should leave the cleanup work to licensed contractors who know how to handle asbestos.

During cleanup efforts, workers can decrease the risk of asbestos exposure by wearing N-100, P-100 or R-100 respirators that have been approved for use by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

In case it’s absolutely necessary for non-trained individuals to handle the wreckage, they can help reduce the asbestos dangers by wetting the debris with water first. Anything that gets discarded should be stored in leak-proof containers.

You can help the survivors
Protection from asbestos is always necessary, but let’s not forget that survivors are going to need a lot more help in the next few weeks. Even if you live thousands of miles away from Oklahoma, there’s still a lot that you can do to help people in need. Several organizations are collecting monetary donations:

  • The American Red Cross. You can easily contribute $10 to relief efforts by texting the word REDCROSS to 90999.
  • The Oklahoma Baptist Disaster Relief fund. Sending checks to BGCO, Attn: Disaster Relief, 3800 N. May Ave., Oklahoma City, OK, 73112.
  • United Way of Central Oklahoma. Mail checks to the United Way of Central Oklahoma, P.O. Box 837, Oklahoma City, OK, 73101. Write “May Tornado Relief” in the memo.

Many of these groups, and more, also accept donations through their websites.

In addition to making monetary contributions, remember that medical needs are also pressing. During these times of disaster, consider donating blood to your local Red Cross chapter or other blood bank.

Rotterdam Convention 2013 Summary

Laurie Kazan-Allen and some of the French activists from ANDEVA = Pour un monde sans amiante – for a world without asbestos

Laurie Kazan-Allen and some of the French activists from ANDEVA = Pour un monde sans amiante – for a world without asbestos

Over the past couple of weeks I have written about the scandal that was the Rotterdam Convention 2013 and the disturbing trend of countries advocating for the asbestos industry. My sister, Laurie Kazan-Allen, coordinator of the International Asbestos Secretariat was awarded observer status at this 6th Conference of the Parties and witnessed firsthand the developments of this important global meeting. I thank her for allowing me to use her frontline diary as the foundation for the summary report which follows.

Monday, May 6, 2013: Arrival / Registration/ Introductions

With the Convention covering a broad list of hazardous chemicals, the observers with a primary focus on the chrysotile asbestos issue included: Dr. Barry Castleman (U.S.), Kathleen Ruff (Canada), Laurie Kazan-Allen and Bill Lawrence (Britain), Alessandro Pugno (Italy), Sugio Furuya (Japan), and Fernanda Giannasi (Brazil).

Tuesday, May 7, 2013:

Delegations from Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan Zimbabwe, Kyrgyzstan, Vietnam and India stated their intention to block the listing of chrysotile asbestos, earning the title “Dirty 7”. It was apparent that this was a political campaign spearheaded by Russia.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013:

cop6_side_event_sugio_2013_822A letter from an Italian asbestos victim’s group that was signed by 28 asbestos victims’ support groups in 15 countries on five continents was presented. Later in the day several speakers described the humanitarian disasters caused by asbestos in their countries. Russian asbestos lobbyist Andrei Kholzakov made several attempts to intervene in the humanitarian session. At one point he stood up and waved a piece of asbestos propaganda headlined “People for Chrysotile.”

Thursday May 9, 2013:

With the rules of the Rotterdam Convention requiring a global unanimous consensus, in an atmosphere of frustration it was determined that the issue of adding chrysotile asbestos to the list of hazardous chemicals would be put on the agenda for the next Conference.

Friday May 10, 2013:

Achim Steiner, executive director of the U.N. Environment Program expressed the following comment:

“It’s very easy to say we’ve failed. But the fact of the matter is that asbestos essentially has no future… Do you really believe that after everything that has been discussed here [industry] will invest in this material in the future? No, and in that sense the convention has a direct and indirect value in signaling what are the substances that are not likely to be in the global marketplace in the near or middle term.”

To read the abridged positions and views expressed by delegates, scroll down to the appendix here.

 

DIY Enthusiasts and the Risks of Asbestos Exposure

asbestos exposurePeople who enjoy taking on home renovation projects themselves are usually cognizant of the safety risks involved. They know when to turn the gas off, how to steer clear of live electric wires and how to keep power tools safely isolated. If the house or building that a do-it-yourself enthusiast is working on is particularly old, he or she should also be aware of the likelihood of asbestos exposure.

The problem, though, is that the material is so ubiquitous that it’s not always easy to tell what contains asbestos and what doesn’t. Recently, I read a blogger’s column that discussed how asbestos can be found in certain doors.

Fire doors ironically can pose safety risks
Australian blogger David Caldwell, who also works as a transport engineer, wrote an entry about how he was installing a new lock on a fire door that was manufactured during the 1980s. The project involved drilling a series of holes through the wood of the door.

As you can imagine, all that drilling produced a lot of dust. Initially, all the dust resembled timber. However, as the sun went down and the work progressed, Caldwell hadn’t noticed that the texture of the dust was changing. It was only after Caldwell started to brush the dust off his clothing that he noticed it contained different colors. When he shined a flashlight on the dust, he saw white and gray coloration.

After having samples sent to a lab, he learned that the fire door was manufactured with asbestos and that, to his horror, he had been breathing in the dust at eye level.

Why is asbestos present in fire doors?
For thousands of years, civilization has used asbestos because of its physical properties that make it strong and resistant to heat, friction and fire. This led manufacturers of fire doors to use this mineral for their products. Asbestos may also be present in the wood or metal components of regular doors as a form of insulation.

Asbestos usually doesn’t pose a health threat to anyone unless it’s been disturbed somehow. When it comes to maintenance work on doors, that means it’s a good idea to refrain from using power tools, which would damage the material and make mineral fibers airborne. Once these fibers enter a human body, they can cause diseases such as malignant mesothelioma and lung cancer to develop unnoticed for decades.

Where else is asbestos found?
Asbestos use in the U.S. reached its peak around the mid-1970s, when the mineral was present in more than 3,000 commercial and industrial products. That means that buildings and houses that were erected during this time are likely to contain products tainted by asbestos.

If you enjoy doing home maintenance and renovation projects yourself, remember that asbestos may be present in:

  • Vermiculite insulation in the walls or attic
  • Vinyl flooring and backing
  • Textured paint
  • Walls and floors that surround wood-burning stoves
  • Hot water or steam pipes
  • Oil and coal furnaces
  • Unless a product is clearly labeled, you’re not likely to be certain of whether it contains asbestos. If that’s the case, you should assume that it does have asbestos and make an effort not to let anyone disturb it.

But, if you think you’d feel better knowing, send a sample of the object in question to a laboratory for analysis. For your safety, don’t do this yourself. Instead, hire a professional who’s been specially trained to handle asbestos.

Asbestos Roof Materials Can Put Workers at Serious Risk

asbestos exposureWhether you’re a carpenter or a do-it-yourself enthusiast around the house, you need to know how to protect yourself from asbestos exposure. If you’re working on an older building, you may not know that the material can be found in insulation products, vinyl flooring and other items.

We know all about these hidden dangers at Kazan Law. We once represented a mesothelioma patient who worked hard during the 1970s, buying “fixer-upper” type houses and renovating them with his own hands. What he didn’t know was that many of these properties were tainted with asbestos-containing products.

Roofing materials can be especially worrisome because they’re among the many products that, to this day, are still allowed to include asbestos in the manufacturing process.

What items contain asbestos?
For hundreds of years, people have used asbestos because of its physical properties, which make it strong and resistant to heat and friction. This led to the use of asbestos in the manufacturing of several products used in construction. Roofing materials seemed like a natural fit, as a roof protects a building’s occupants from the elements and, in some cases, retards the spread of a dangerous fire. Buildings that were erected before the 1980s may have roofs with asbestos-tainted asphalt shingles, cement shingles, sealants, flashing and underlayment.

There are several roofing products today that are still allowed to contain asbestos, including felt, coating and cement shingles.

Why is asbestos still allowed?
For more than 70 years, scientists have linked asbestos to several deadly diseases, including asbestosis, lung cancer and malignant mesothelioma. Given those facts, it’s natural for one to wonder: If asbestos is so dangerous, why is it still allowed in the manufacturing process of certain products?

The answer is quite complex, but basically, the asbestos lobby has fought tooth and nail against government efforts to curb use of the material. For example, during the 1970s, federal agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency began forbidding the use of asbestos in certain types of insulation. The big crackdown, though, came in 1989, when the EPA proposed what was essentially an all-out ban on asbestos use. However, the asbestos industry took this law to court and successfully reversed most of its power.

Today, asbestos is still banned from products such as flooring felt and commercial paper, as well as any new uses. However, it’s still allowed in the manufacturing of many products that have always used it, including roofing materials.

Protection is possible during projects
The most definitive way to tell whether a roofing item contains asbestos is to read the original product label. If that’s unavailable, the determination of asbestos roof content, as well as its removal, are best left to a specially trained professional.

When someone is working on a roof that may contain asbestos, there are several measures that can help minimize exposure to the material. First, it’s important to keep all unnecessary personnel out of the area. Also, workers need to be sure they’re wearing respirators with P100 cartridge filters, because ordinary dust masks won’t help. Single-use disposable clothing that can be discarded at the end of the day is also advisable.

Plastic drop cloths around the house will help collect debris. Any materials that contain asbestos should be kept wet at all times. If anything has to be removed from the asbestos roof, it’s important to work slowly in order to minimize the amount of breaking and airborne mineral fibers. Materials that need to be thrown away should be lowered carefully to the ground rather than dropped down.

Once the waste is collected, it should be sealed in leak-tight bags, drums or 6-mil polyethylene sheeting.

At the end of the workday, clothes should be discarded and never reused. Both the exposed skin and the tools need to be washed carefully. Also, workers need to be careful not to track any dust or dirt with them into the house on which they’re working.

The New Asbestos Industry Allies

asbestos lobbyAlthough civilization has used asbestos in manufacturing for centuries, the last seven decades of scientific research found an undeniable link between the mineral and deadly diseases such as malignant mesothelioma. Slowly but surely, responsible companies in industrialized nations have made it a priority to reduce their use of asbestos.

However, developing nations aren’t as fortunate. Their respective economies leave them with few alternatives to accepting exports from richer countries that mine and produce asbestos-containing materials, and that’s an outrageous injustice.

The international trade community had a chance to right this wrong at this year’s United Nation’s Rotterdam Convention. In the days leading up to the meeting, one activist noted a particularly disturbing trend: While one country that advocated for the asbestos industry has stepped down, two others have taken its place as asbestos industry allies.

Canada disappears from industry’s corner
The Rotterdam Convention is an international, U.N.-sponsored meeting in which international trade stakeholders come together and decide whether certain products for export are to be considered hazardous to human health, making them rightfully difficult to peddle.

During the last few assemblies of the Rotterdam Convention, Canada refused to cooperate with international efforts to list chrysotile asbestos as a hazardous substance. This is appalling, considering that the mineral is considered dangerous within the country’s own borders. Canada’s fight against the Rotterdam Convention on this matter was driven in large part by its once-thriving asbestos industry.

However, in 2011, officials from Quebec announced that they would stop subsidizing the asbestos industry. Kathleen Ruff, co-coordinator of the Rotterdam Convention Alliance, argued that this move is behind what she calls Canada’s new, cynically driven stance on no longer opposing adding chrysotile asbestos to the list of hazardous materials. That’s not to say that Canada will be vocally supporting the move, either, Ruff said.

Two countries fill Canada’s shoes
Ruff’s new concern is that there are two countries that will pick up where Canada left off on the chrysotile asbestos matter as asbestos industry allies: Russia and Zimbabwe.
Here’s how Ruff described the situation in an editorial for The Star in Canada:

“Russia will be attending for the first time as a party to the convention. It has indicated that it intends to use its new status to prevent chrysotile asbestos from being put on the hazardous substance list,” Ruff wrote. “In Russia, with a population of 141 million people, there is not a single scientist or a single scientific organization that opposes the government’s pro-asbestos policy. Or, at any rate, there is not a single scientist or scientific body that dares to do so publicly.”

Additionally, Zimbabwe has indicated interest in reopening its own asbestos mines. Between these two countries, many people will needlessly die from preventable asbestos-induced diseases, including asbestosis and lung cancer.

There are asbestos industry lobbyists who argue that the wealth of scientific information connecting the mineral to health problems has led to safety measures that are adequate enough to not require additional restrictions. However, experts point out that developing countries, some of which have to accept asbestos-tainted exports, don’t have the necessary regulatory bodies to adequately enforce these safety measures.

Let’s not forget how powerful the asbestos lobby is. In the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency proposed a serious crackdown on asbestos use in 1989, but two years later, the industry successfully got most of the ban overturned in federal court. As a result, asbestos is still allowed in many manufacturing processes in the U.S.

The Fight for Workers Dealing with Asbestos Exposure

asbestos exposureIn countries such as the U.S., certain conveniences are often taken for granted, including cars, plumbing and electricity. In the hustle and bustle of everyday life, we rarely think about the amount of work and labor that went into producing these goods. Such a thought becomes poignant when we remember that some workers deal with asbestos exposure and other hazardous materials during the manufacturing process.

It’s important for us at Kazan Law to take time out and remember to honor these workers, and remind ourselves of why we’re trying to reduce the threat of asbestos exposure at home and around the world. That’s why, on April 28, we joined an international collection of labor unions in solidarity as we commemorated Workers’ Memorial Day as well as World Day for Safety and Health at Work.

Organizations push for better working conditions
When it comes to industries such as construction or manufacturing, the health hazards that workers face go above and beyond the everyday stress that people in other sectors face. Not only are some of these jobs physically demanding, but they also expose workers to certain hazardous materials, including asbestos.

Every year, on April 28, unions such as the AFL-CIO celebrate Workers’ Memorial Day to remember individuals who died because of disease or injuries they suffered while on the job. These incidents are sometimes the product of negligence on the part of irresponsible employers. Workers’ Memorial Day reminds us of the importance of speaking up for these individuals and correcting the mistakes that cost them their lives.

In that spirit, the International Labour Organization also designated April 28 as World Day for Safety and Health at Work. The ILO notes that every year, 2.34 million individuals around the world die from job-related causes. Of these casualties, 2.02 million are caused by diseases, including malignant mesothelioma and asbestosis.

This means that, on average, one person dies every 15 seconds because of a work-related accident or sickness. Developing countries are disproportionately hit because of the prominence that hazardous industries such as construction and mining have within their economies.

These trends are not only upsetting because they hurt the global economy – there’s also an immeasurable human cost for those who die, as well as the loved ones they leave behind.

However, April 28 reminds us of the importance of letting workers have a voice in unions, and collecting good data that holds industries accountable for their practices.

Kazan Law fights for workers
When it comes to asbestos-related diseases alone, the World Health Organization estimates that these illnesses claim more than 107,000 lives every year because of occupational asbestos exposure. The agency is working with intergovernmental groups around the planet to solve this problem by curbing asbestos use, encouraging the use of safer alternative materials and supporting research toward better treatments.

Our law firm is happy to stand by such causes. On a more local level, we also fight irresponsible companies who unscrupulously expose their workers to asbestos. Some of our recent victories include the cases of an auto mechanic for the Ford Motor Company in Hayward, Calif., a PG&E laborer, a machinist and a welder. All of these individuals were exposed to asbestos without receiving adequate warning or protection from the dangers involved, and we succeeded in persuading juries to award them a more-than-combined $20 million in damages.

Still, it would have been best if none of them were exposed to asbestos in the first place. This is why it’s important to continue fighting for the safety of all workers around the world.

Honoring the 2013 Broussard Scholarship Recipients

Broussard Scholarship recipients 2013

From left, Steven Kazan, Scholar Evelyn Rangel-Medina, Scholar Chris Ballard, Scholar Tenette Smith, Broussard Board member Jill Dessalines, Scholar Marlene Benedict

Last week the Alameda County Superior Court and the Allen E. Broussard Scholarship Foundation co-sponsored Alameda County Superior Court Law Day, where the recipients of the 2013 Broussard Scholarship were honored at the Law Day Student Luncheon. The Kazan, McClain, Abrams, Fernandez, Lyons, Greenwood, Oberman, Satterley & Bosl Foundation was pleased to support the Allen E. Broussard Scholarship Foundation and the funding of one of this year’s scholarships.

The Allen E. Broussard Scholarship Fund was established in 1996 after the death of California Supreme Court Associate Justice Allen E. Broussard, and was incorporated as the Allen E. Broussard Scholarship Foundation in 1999. The goal of the foundation is to continue Justice Broussard’s work in the minority community in assisting young lawyers in their pursuit of a career in the legal profession.

Having served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Allen E. Broussard Law School Scholarship Foundation for over a decade, it pleases me each year to present three or more academically well qualified students from economically deprived backgrounds with a $5,000 scholarship. This award is the largest private scholarship award for law students attending California Bay Area law schools. Four students received the award this year.

2013 Broussard Scholarship Awards

Chris Ballard was raised in the San Joaquin Valley city of Wasco, California. Overcoming the struggles of poverty, he went on to study Politics and Business at California State University, Fresno. Upon graduating, Mr. Ballard turned down a position on Wall Street to work as a Community Organizer for a non-profit organization helping people who were losing their homes. He was appointed as Planning Commissioner for the City of Wasco, the youngest in California history and the first African-American to do so in Wasco. Mr. Ballard will be studying at UC Hastings College of the Law this fall.

Marlene E. Benedict is the first American-born member of her family, who immigrated to the United States from Managua, Nicaragua in the 1980s. Growing up in a working class neighborhood in the East Bay, she is committed to practicing public service law close to her hometown. Ms. Benedict received her Bachelors of Arts degree in Political Science and History from UC Santa Barbara and is attending the University of San Francisco School of Law.  She believes that advocating for the rights of marginalized communities and facilitating how legal services are administered to the general public is her calling.

Evelyn Rangel-Medina is the first person in her family to graduate from college. She graduated magna cum laude from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, where she attained three B.A.’s in Women’s Studies, English and Political Science. A 2013-2014 Phoenix Fellow of the Berkeley Law Foundation, she will enter the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Ms. Rangel-Medina is the co-founder and former president of the United Coalition for Immigrant Rights (UCIR). She also worked as Policy Director of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, where she successfully advocated the creation of the Climate Change Community Benefits Fund. After law school, she plans to become a public interest lawyer and work for transformative social and political change.

Tenette Smith was born and raised in Modesto, California where she lived with her mother and sister. She received her Bachelor’s Degree in Business Administration from San Diego State University and her degree in Paralegal Studies from Cuyamaca College while working at the San Diego Superior Court. Ms. Smith is in her first year at the University of San Francisco School of Law. She is interested in pursuing a career in public interest law. This summer she will intern at the Federal Defender’s Office in Little Rock, Arkansas as a part of the Keta Taylor Colby Death Penalty Project.

 

Rotterdam Convention a Scandal

Rotterdam ConventionA press release came across my desk this morning that is alarming to the protection of humanity. Today marks the final day of the Rotterdam Convention, a global treaty which promotes open exchange of information between countries and calls on exporters of hazardous chemicals to use proper labeling, include directions on safe handling, and inform purchasers of any known restrictions or bans.

This sixth meeting of the Rotterdam Conference began on April 28th in Geneva, Switzerland. Now for the fourth time, a handful of countries allied to the asbestos industry have refused to allow chrysotile asbestos to be added to the Convention’s list of hazardous substances, even though the Convention’s expert scientific committee has repeatedly recommended that it be listed. In the previous meeting of the conference in 2001, Canada was the only Western country that refused to allow the addition of chrysotile asbestos to the Rotterdam Convention.

Kathleen Ruff, co-coordinator of the Rotterdam Convention reports “It is outrageous that seven countries – Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, Zimbabwe, India and Vietnam –are turning the Rotterdam Convention into a Convention that protects profits of the asbestos industry, instead of protecting human health and the environment.”

In her report, my sister, Laurie Kazan-Allen, coordinator of the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat describes this ruthless conduct as the end of innocence. “The Convention requires that countries practice responsible trade by obtaining prior informed consent before they export hazardous substances to another country. But these seven countries are determined to practice irresponsible trade and to hide the hazards of chrysotile asbestos,” said Laurie.

Last year, an Italian court sentenced two asbestos executives to 16 years in jail for criminally suppressing information about the hazards of asbestos. Their crime resulted in up to 3000 deaths, including citizens living near their asbestos-cement factories.

“By not listing chrysotile asbestos, the Convention is enabling the industry to carry on the same criminal cover-up of the hazards of chrysotile asbestos, which will result in hundreds of thousands more tragic deaths, which could and should be prevented,” said Dr. Barry Castleman, former consultant on asbestos to the World Bank. “This is a crime against humanity and the whole world should be scandalized.”

Asbestos Exposure Warnings for Mining Operations

asbestos exposureIn some parts of the country, the economic climate has forced several communities to consider drastic actions to revive their job sectors. For some regions, this means turning to mining. This isn’t a decision to take lightly, because mining can wreck the local environment. Also, depending on what the local rock ores and soil are made of, the mining operations can potentially put the surrounding communities at risk of asbestos exposure.

Whenever these proposals pop up, it’s no wonder that local residents and experts often become worried. In Wisconsin, where a state Senate bill would approve the establishment of iron mines, one retired geologist wrote in to a local newspaper, explaining that these operations would be a mistake for a number of reasons – asbestos exposure being one of them.

Where is asbestos found?
One of the troubles of mining for isolated minerals like iron is that the miners have to tear through other ores and minerals to get to what they want. If this rock includes asbestos, that can mean trouble for the workers and residents.

Naturally occurring asbestos can be found in certain layers of rock that lie near fault zones. In these areas, asbestos can make up between 1 and 25 percent of the volume of rock and soil.

Mineral fibers usually don’t pose a threat to local people unless they’re disturbed, and a mining operation is certain to put people at risk.

Geologist questions the pros and cons
Neil Koch, a retired geologist, wrote an editorial for the Dunn County News in Wisconsin. He took issue with state Senate Bill 1, which would open the way for a pit iron mine in northern Wisconsin. Although such an industry would create more jobs and lead to the establishment of more retail businesses to accommodate economic growth, Koch said the benefits cannot last forever. In fact, he anticipates it becoming non-profitable at a certain point, and once the miners leave, the local residents will be left devastated.

For one thing, the mining operations are likely to rip asbestos fibers out of the soil, therefore increasing people’s risks of diseases such as malignant pleural mesothelioma and lung cancer. Also, the machinery and waste rock involved in mining would contaminate the local air and bodies of water with chemical hazards such as mercury and arsenic.

Koch said that he’d seen other mining towns go in this direction in the past, and he’s afraid that communities in Wisconsin won’t be able to recover once they’ve exhausted the land’s resources. He also pointed out that rates of mesothelioma tend to be higher in areas such as the former mining communities in northern Minnesota, compared to the rest of the country.

Keep soil and dirt out of your house
Researchers have known about the health risks associated with asbestos exposure since the early 20th century. Since then, the asbestos industry has fought scientists every step of the way in their efforts to protect the general public from asbestos-containing materials.

If you’re worried about how to keep asbestos-tainted soil and dust out of the house, there are several ways you can protect yourself from asbestos exposure:

  • Walk, run, bike or hike only on paved ground.
  • Make sure your children only play on ground that’s covered in mulch, grass, sand, wood chips, grass, asphalt or rubber.
  • Pave over any unpaved areas that surround your house.
  • Place doormats outside each entrance so that people and pets can wipe their feet before entering.
  • Keep your windows and doors closed on windy days.
  • Vacuum your carpet using only products that have HEPA filters.
  • Use only wet rags or mops to dust or clean non-carpeted areas.

It’s unfortunate that you, as the consumers, need to know how to protect yourself from unscrupulous and irresponsible businesses. If you think this is unfair too, let your lawmakers know how you feel about the dangers of asbestos exposure.

Get a Free Case Evaluation
The owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.